Privilege ordinarily refers to some special right or entitlement of a particular group. Something can only be a privilege when it's not the default. A situation where a small subset does not have a default right or entitlement doesn't really have a general name in English. People can be said to be disenfranchised, disadvantaged, disabled, underage, etc, according to circumstance, but one person's disadvantage doesn't make the opposite a privilege! The John's Hopkins list of of "privileged" categories of people is hilarious. Right off the bat, approximately 95% of the population is cisgender, so 5% is the smallest percentage of non-privileged people that can exist. But of that 5%, a large fraction are male--call it half even though it's probably larger. That leaves only 2.5% who are not privileged. Likewise, at least half of people are middle aged; in the US 2/3 profess to be Christian; and the great majority are able-bodied. It's hard to say how these categories overlap, but suffice it to say, it leaves a vanishingly small percentage of non-privileged people--no where near 1%. And we haven't even considered pretty-privilege! "Males -Whites -Christians -Middle-aged people -Able-bodied people -Middle & owning class -English-speaking people, hetrosexual/cisgender people. " Dividing the world into privileged and unprivileged makes nonsense of the social justice movement. Social justice should work in two directions, moving both the unfairly privileged and the disadvantaged into the ranks of the ordinary citizen.